Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Scottish Ambulance Service

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201909475 Sector Health Category Clinical treatment / Diagnosis Decided 01 May 2021

View Scottish Ambulance Service scorecard

Full decision

Summary

C complained about the actions of Scottish Ambulance Service (SAS) staff when they attended to their adult child (A) following an epileptic seizure (bursts of electrical activity in the brain that temporarily affect how it works and can cause a wide range of symptoms). A was moved onto a chair to be taken out of the house to an ambulance. When A arrived at hospital they were found to have broken vertebrae (individual bones that interlock with each other to form the spinal column). C complained about the manner in which staff had transferred A and about their clinical assessment of A.

SAS said that staff carried out a risk assessment on how to get A to the ambulance; the moving and handling skills applied were based on the clinical assessment of A and access difficulties at the scene.

We took independent advice from a paramedic. We found that the history assessment and energy involved with A's mechanism of injury made it extremely unlikely to cause a significant spinal injury. Given the age and medical history obtained, there were no risk factors which would lead the paramedic to suspect spinal injury. This, coupled with the restricted space within which they were working, made the use of a carry chair a reasonable means of transferring the patient. Therefore, we did not uphold this complaint.

In relation to the clinical assessment, we found that while A complained of back pain, this was not considered to be a spinal injury. We considered the assessment and management were reasonable for a patient suffering a 'seizure now stopped'. We noted that the paramedic used the finding of motor, sensation and circulation of lower limbs in their risk assessment to help rule out/in spinal injury. Given the history and assessment findings, we considered the care provided was reasonable. As such, we did not uphold this complaint.

We noted there had been complaints handling issues, but SAS had taken appropriate steps to address this and had apologised to C.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201909475 as a PDF (24.74 KB) Updated: May 19, 2021

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Scottish Ambulance Service

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202410343 01 Jan 2026 C complained on behalf of their friend (A), a care home resident. A became unwell and was in a lot … Upheld
202304529 01 Aug 2025 C complained that the Scottish Ambulance Service (SAS) unreasonably delayed in dispatching an ambulance for their late parent (A) and, … Not Upheld
202206802 01 May 2024 C complained about delays in ambulance response time after their elderly parent (A) had a fall at their care home. … Not Upheld
202209883 01 Apr 2024 C complained about the care and treatment that their spouse (A) received from Scottish Ambulance Service (SAS). C called for … Upheld
202203262 01 Mar 2024 C contacted the Scottish Ambulance Service (SAS) when they began experiencing abdominal pain. An ambulance attended but did not take … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation