Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Inverclyde Health and Social Care Partnership

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201908766 Sector Health and Social Care Category assessments / self-directed support Decided 01 January 2021

Full decision

Summary

C, an advocacy and support worker, complained on behalf of their client (A) about Self Directed Support (SDS) decisions made by the partnership. A's family had arranged for carers from an agency, which provides carers on a self-employed basis, to provide care to their family member (B). A asked for an SDS assessment to be carried out in order for contributions to the cost of carers to be made by the partnership. Several months later, the partnership told A that the request for SDS payments had been declined on the basis that the local policy advises employing personal assistants, rather than self-employed workers.

During their complaints investigation, the partnership acknowledged and apologised that there had been a delay in communicating their position. They also confirmed to us that they had updated their guidance to make their position on engaging self-employed carers more clear; and that staff training had been carried out on this matter.

We considered that the failure to notify the family of the issues regarding self-employed carers at an earlier stage was unreasonable. We also considered that the explanation provided to the family could have been clearer. On this basis, we upheld this aspect of the complaint.

In terms of actions taken by the partnership, we found that the updates made to the guidance were appropriate, but made a recommendation to ensure that all associated guidance such as practitioner's guides fully reflect the position. We also recommended that the partnership provide a further apology to the family and that they provide evidence of the staff training carried out.

Recommendations

What we asked the organisation to do in this case: Apologise to A for failing to communicate reasonably with them regarding SDS options and payments. The apology should meet the standards set out in the SPSO guidelines on apology available at www.spso.org.uk/information-leaflets.

What we said should change to put things right in future: Families should be informed at the earliest opportunity of any issues or concerns which may impact on their ability to receive SDS payments.

The guidance should be clear about the partnership's position on using SDS payments for self-employed carers.

We have asked the organisation to provide us with evidence that they have implemented the recommendations we have made on this case by the deadline we set.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201908766 as a PDF (27.19 KB) Updated: January 20, 2021

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Inverclyde Health and Social Care Partn…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201906670 01 May 2021 C, an advocacy worker, complained on behalf of their client (A) about the community mental health services provided to A … Not Upheld
201803262 01 Sep 2020 C complained about the care and treatment A had received at Inverclyde Royal Hospital before their death. A was admitted … Not Upheld
201808264 01 Jun 2020 Ms C, a support and advocacy worker, raised a complaint on behalf of her client (Mr A) about the support … Upheld
201809148 01 Jun 2020 Ms C, an advocacy worker, complained on behalf of her client (Mr A) about the partnership's actions regarding his tenancy … Partly Upheld
201707713 01 May 2019 Mr C, an MP, complained on behalf of his constituent (Ms A) that the partnership mishandled a complaint Ms A … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation