Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Lothian NHS Board - Acute Division

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201908401 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 January 2021

View NHS Lothian scorecard

Full decision

Summary

C complained on behalf of their late sibling (A). A was admitted to hospital to have their pacemaker and the leads, which attach it to the heart, extracted. There was a 2-3% risk of major bleeding and A signed a consent form for the procedure. During the operation, the surgeon successfully removed one of the pacemaker leads but whilst attempting to remove the final two, A's blood pressure suddenly dropped. This was recognised by the anaesthetist and the major haemorrhage protocol was activated. An emergency call for surgical assistance was placed. Despite chest compressions and fluids, staff were unable to stop the bleeding and A died. When the surgeon had tried to remove one of the leads, a tear had been created in one of the major veins around the heart. C complained that the surgery had not been carried out to a reasonable standard.

We took independent advice from a consultant cardiologist (a doctor that specialises in diseases and abnormalities of the heart). A's pacemaker, at several years old, would be well embedded in scar tissue. There was infection at the site, and the device was pushing through the front wall of A's chest. There were other options for treating this, but laser lead extraction was the best option for a long-term recovery. The operation appeared to have been carried out reasonably, with staff taking prompt and appropriate action when A's blood pressure dropped. There was nothing more the staff could have done to save A's life once the bleed occurred.

We did raise concerns about the consent process. We noted that A had signed a consent form on the day and the risk of major bleeding was noted. However, the board should have used a more detailed consent form with other fields, including alternative treatment options, and that consent should have been obtained prior to the day of surgery as well as the day of it. On balance, we did not uphold the complaint as the evidence indicated that the standard of A's surgery was reasonable.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201908401 as a PDF (24.74 KB) Updated: January 20, 2021

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Lothian NHS Board - Acute Division

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202301188 01 Dec 2024 C complained that Lothian NHS Board (Board 1) unreasonably failed to maintain records of specialist advice they provided to another … Partly Upheld
202301420 01 Nov 2024 C complained that the board failed to provide them with appropriate orthopaedic (specialists in the treatment of diseases and injuries … Not Upheld
202208872 01 Nov 2024 C complained about the care and treatment that their late parent (A) received while in hospital. A suffered a fall … Upheld
202303330 01 Sep 2024 C complained about the care and treatment that they received from the board. C underwent a left total hip replacement … Upheld
202208467 01 Sep 2024 C complained about the nursing care and treatment provided to their late parent (A). A had a fall during an … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation