Summary
C complained on behalf of A who has a terminal cancer diagnosis. A was diagnosed with a metastatic carcinoma (a cancer that grows at sites distant from the primary site of origin) of possible colorectal (colon) or ovarian origin and progress lung nodules. C complained that A was misdiagnosed multiple times and given the wrong treatment.
The board said that A underwent a number of investigations in order to identify the source of the primary cancer. They explained that surgery was not a viable treatment option.
We took independent advice from a consultant clinical oncologist (a doctor who specialises in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer).
We found that the investigations carried out were appropriate and the length of time taken reflected the challenges faced in trying to identify the source of the primary cancer. There was no evidence to suggest that A was misdiagnosed or given the wrong treatment. We identified that there was a delay in completing the colorectal investigations however, on balance, we did not consider that this delay was significant as it did not have a detrimental impact on A's prognosis. As such, we concluded that the care and treatment was reasonable and we did not uphold the complaint.
Related reading
View Decision Report 201908128 as a PDF (24.31 KB) Updated: March 24, 2021