Summary
C complained that nursing staff failed to provide them with adequate personal care following an enema (an injection of fluid into the lower bowel by way of the rectum to expel its contents, to introduce drugs or to permit X-ray imaging) at University Hospital Monklands. C also complained about the provision of toilet facilities on a ward. They said that their experience had caused significant trauma. We took independent advice from a nursing adviser. We found that there was insufficient evidence to suggest that that the board provided C with inadequate personal care. We did not uphold this complaint.
C also complained that the board had failed to communicate effectively with them after they had a laparoscopy (an examination of the abdominal organs using surgical methods to determine the reason of pain or other complications of the pelvic region or abdomen) at a private hospital under a waiting list initiative. They said that this had caused delay to their treatment. We found that there had been a delay in communicating the results of the laparoscopy to C and this caused delay to C's treatment. The board were wrong to consider that C's GP should have discussed the results of the laparoscopy with them. The board requested the laparoscopy and it was their responsibility to discuss this with C. We upheld this complaint.
Recommendations
What we asked the organisation to do in this case: Apologise to C for the failure to adequately communicate the results and/or findings of the laparoscopy with C. The apology should meet the standards set out in the SPSO guidelines on apology available atwww.spso.org.uk/information-leaflets.
What we said should change to put things right in future: Staff should be aware of their responsibility to directly discuss the outcomes and/or findings of tests or procedures they have requested with their patients.
They will ensure that mistakes are rectified.
We have asked the organisation to provide us with evidence that they have implemented the recommendations we have made on this case by the deadline we set.
Related reading
View Decision Report 201907694 as a PDF (27.01 KB) Updated: May 18, 2022