Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201907234 Sector Health Category Clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 December 2020

View NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde scorecard

Full decision

Summary

C’s child (A) was referred to have a tonsillectomy (surgical removal of the tonsils) and grommets (a small tube inserted in the eardrum to drain fluid) inserted as they had been experiencing seizures and recurrent ear infections. On the day of surgery, the surgeon decided not to insert grommets as A's ears were healthy and there was potential for an unnecessary intervention. C complained that the surgeon failed to carry out the agreed surgery.

We took independent advice from an ear, nose and throat consultant. We found that it was appropriate for the surgeon to make a clinical judgement on the day of surgery based on the clinical presentation of the child. We noted that the clinical decision was supported by clinical research and it was therefore reasonable. As such, we did not uphold the complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201907234 as a PDF (24.14 KB) Updated: December 16, 2020

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - A…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202405247 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their parent (A). A had dementia and had suffered several falls. … Partly Upheld
202502009 01 May 2026 C complained that they were inappropriately triaged at A&E because sepsis had not been considered, their symptoms and history were … Not Upheld
202409771 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided by nursing staff to their late sibling (A), who was admitted to … Upheld
202406274 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment of their adult child (A) following A’s admission to hospital. A had a … Partly Upheld
202405343 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment that their late partner (A) received from the board’s gynaecology and oncology services … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation