Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Forth Valley NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201905455 Sector Health Category Clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 March 2021

View NHS Forth Valley scorecard

Full decision

Summary

C complained about a psychiatric consultation at Falkirk Community Hospital. They complained that they did not receive adequate support from the psychiatrist and that the psychiatrist made inappropriate comments regarding the impact of suicide on others and the best way to complete suicide. We took independent advice from a consultant psychiatrist. It was not possible to confirm from the notes the way the psychiatrist communicated with C or exactly what was discussed surrounding suicide. The board explained that it was the psychiatrist's normal practice to discuss the impact of suicide on others but refuted that C was advised of the best way to take their own life. We considered that the psychiatrist carried out a reasonable assessment and proposed an appropriate management plan. We did not uphold this complaint.

C also complained that a board run GP practice refused to continue their prescription for gabapentin (an anticonvulsant medication primarily used to treat partial seizures and neuropathic pain) until C had been seen by the psychiatrist. This medication had been prescribed overseas and C noted that it was for restless leg syndrome (RLS) and not a psychological condition. The board explained that gabapentin is a controlled drug in the UK which can only be prescribed in specific circumstances and with specialist input. They noted it is unlicensed for RLS. We took independent advice from a GP, who noted that gabapentin can be prescribed 'off-label' to treat RLS and they saw no reason for changing this if C had been taking it with good effect and was established on a reasonable dose. However, if the practice had concerns and wished to change this, it should have been gradually reduced and not stopped suddenly. We concluded that it was unreasonable to have refused to prescribe C gabapentin pending a psychiatric review. We upheld this complaint.

Recommendations

What we asked the organisation to do in this case: Apologise to C for the stoppage of their gabapentin without a reduction regime. The apology should meet the standards set out in the SPSO guidelines on apology available at www.spso.org.uk/information-leaflets.

What we said should change to put things right in future: The board should ensure the practice GPs familiarise themselves with gabapentin reduction regimes and the indications for the same.

We have asked the organisation to provide us with evidence that they have implemented the recommendations we have made on this case by the deadline we set.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201905455 as a PDF (26.66 KB) Updated: March 24, 2021

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Forth Valley NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202500014 01 Jun 2026 C complained that the board failed to report an injury to their spouse (A)'s wrist. A was in hospice care … Partly Upheld
202401232 01 May 2026 C, an independent advocate, complained on behalf of B, about the standard of medical and nursing care provided to B’s … Partly Upheld
202405861 01 Feb 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their infant child (A) who was born with a terminal genetic … Not Upheld
202402894 01 Jan 2026 C complained on behalf of their partner (A) about the care and treatment that A received from the board during … Partly Upheld
202403721 01 Jan 2026 C complained on behalf of their sibling (A) in relation to the care and treatment that the board provided to … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation