We took independent advice from a consultant psychiatrist. We found that treatment was in line with recognised clinical practice. There were records of C’s medication being reviewed and altered on a number of occasions. There was also written evidence that a discharge plan was in place and discussed with C, although no specific discharge date had been set. We did not uphold C's complaint.
View Decision Report 201905223 as a PDF (23.93 KB) Updated: November 18, 2020
| Reference | Date | Summary | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 202408872 | 01 May 2026 | C complained about the care and treatment provided to their adult child (A). A experienced a decline in mental health … | Not Upheld |
| 202408118 | 01 Feb 2026 | C, a prisoner, complained that the partnership reduced and then stopped their prescription of co-codomol (a medication used to treat … | Not Upheld |
| 202401251 | 01 Apr 2025 | C complained in relation to their late child (A) and the actions of the social work services. A suffered from … | Not Upheld |
| 202400112 | 01 Apr 2025 | C complained about the care and treatment provided to their adult child (A) by the partnership. A had received care … | Upheld |
| 202210928 | 01 Nov 2024 | C complained about the way that the partnership handled their complaint about the care and treatment provided to C’s late … | Upheld |