Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Angus Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201800223 Sector Local Government Category unauthorised developments: enforcement action/stop and discontinuation notices Decided 01 October 2018

View Angus Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained about the council's response to his report of a breach of planning control. He also complained that the council failed to respond reasonably to his complaint.

We took independent advice from a planning adviser. We found that the council had provided a reasonable explanation about the actions they had taken in response to the alleged breach of planning. The council responded to the alleged breach within the appropriate timescales and had discretion to consider what the most appropriate response was. We did not uphold this part of Mr C's complaint.

Regarding complaints handling, we did find that the council's response to Mr C's complaint was outwith timescales. However, the response was thorough and provided a clear explanation of the actions taken. On balance, we did not uphold this aspect of the complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201800223 as a PDF (10.94 KB) Updated: December 2, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Angus Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202200187 01 Jan 2024 C complained about the actions of the council in relation to repairs required at their home. They considered the communication, … Upheld
202005665 01 Nov 2021 C submitted a housing application to the council and complained about how this was handled. C complained that the council … Partly Upheld
202000613 01 Nov 2021 Prior to 2015, C’s grandchild was placed in their care by social work. C was granted a Section 11 Residence … Not Upheld
201907696 01 Feb 2021 C had a child (A). C was subject to a Pre-Birth Risk Assessment. The council put in place a rehabilitation … Not Upheld
201907845 01 Jan 2021 C, a support and advice worker, complained on behalf of their client (A) that the council had unreasonably failed to … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation