Summary
Mr C complained that the board delayed in providing him with surgery for his feet and knees, and that they unreasonably failed to explain the reasons for the delays.
We took independent advice from an orthopaedic surgeon (a surgon who specialises in the musculoskeletal system). We found that the Treatment Time Guarantee places a legal requirement on health boards so that, once planned treatment has been agreed with the patient, the patient must receive that treatment within 12 weeks. We found that Mr C waited around six months for the surgery on his first foot, and then ten months before being seen by a knee surgeon. We found that, whilst medically Mr C came to no harm as a result of the delays, he clearly suffered pain and functional restriction for longer than was reasonable. We upheld this aspect of the complaint.
Regarding communication, we noted that Mr C had received a letter confirming a guarantee of treatment within 12 weeks for his first surgery. The next documented communication was several months later, and was only sent in response to contact from Mr C. We considered that there should have been further communication from the board, apologising for the delay and setting out the steps being taken to minimise this. We found that Mr C had been left for many months without knowng when he might receive surgery. We upheld this aspect of the complaint.
Recommendations
What we asked the organisation to do in this case: Apologise to Mr C for the delays in his orthopaedic treatment.The apology should meet the standards set out in the SPSO guidelines on apology available at www.spso.org.uk/leaflets-and-guidance.
Apologise for failing to explain the reasons for delays in treatment, and for failing to keep Mr C updated with regard to when he could expect to have his surgery.
What we said should change to put things right in future: In the event that the Treatment Time Guarantee is not going to be met, letters to patients should make this clear, in accordance with the Patient Rights (Scotland) Act 2011.
Be clearer with patients about any delays, the reasons for the delay and the steps being taken to improve matters.
Related reading
View Decision Report 201707548 as a PDF (13.76 KB) Updated: December 2, 2018