Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Angus Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201706717 Sector Local Government Category wayleaves / rights of access / feu duties / servitudes Decided 01 December 2018

View Angus Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained that the council failed to reasonably uphold access rights to a field. Mr C was of the view that the landowner had unreasonably locked the gate without providing a stock gate or a stile. Mr C noted that the public had accessed the field for over 20 years. The council contacted the landowner, who confirmed that there was now livestock in the field and that the gate had to be locked to keep the animals in.

The council cited the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 and the Scottish Outdoor Access Code as guiding parameters for their decision not to take enforcement action against the landowner for locking the gate. We found that the council had given due time and consideration to all of the issues brought before them, and had assessed a number of different sources of evidence. The council have stated that they expect the gate to be unlocked at times when no livestock are in the field. We confirmed that it is not for this office to give a definitive intepretation of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003, or the Scottish Outdoor Access Code. We noted that the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 sets out in section 28 that it is for a Sheriff to determine the existence and extent of access rights. We did not uphold Mr C's complaint.

While Mr C did not ask us to investigate how the council handled his complaint, during our investigation we observed that the complaints handling fell below the standard that we would expect. We have therefore made a recommendation that the council apologise to Mr C for this.

Recommendations

What we asked the organisation to do in this case: Apologise to Mr C for the unacceptable delay in responding to his complaint. The apology should meet the standards set out in the SPSO guidelines on apology available at https://www.spso.org.uk/leaflets-and-guidance.

We have asked the organisation to provide us with evidence that they have implemented the recommendations we have made on this case by the deadline we set.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201706717 as a PDF (24.06 KB) Updated: December 19, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Angus Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202200187 01 Jan 2024 C complained about the actions of the council in relation to repairs required at their home. They considered the communication, … Upheld
202005665 01 Nov 2021 C submitted a housing application to the council and complained about how this was handled. C complained that the council … Partly Upheld
202000613 01 Nov 2021 Prior to 2015, C’s grandchild was placed in their care by social work. C was granted a Section 11 Residence … Not Upheld
201907696 01 Feb 2021 C had a child (A). C was subject to a Pre-Birth Risk Assessment. The council put in place a rehabilitation … Not Upheld
201907845 01 Jan 2021 C, a support and advice worker, complained on behalf of their client (A) that the council had unreasonably failed to … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation