Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Tayside NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201706572 Sector Health Category policy / administration Decided 01 July 2018

View NHS Tayside scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Miss C complained that the board unreasonably refused to perform liposuction (a  cosmetic procedure used to remove unwanted body fat) for her lipoedema (a  chronic fat tissue disorder in which fat cells build up, typically on the thighs, buttocks and lower legs, which causes tissue enlargement, swelling and pain. This tissue cannot be lost through weight loss). The board had criteria in place for providing this procedure and Miss C did not meet the criteria. Miss C complained that the criteria were unreasonable.

We took independent advice from a plastic surgeon. We found that it was reasonable for the board to have criteria in place for providing liposuction for lipoedema, and that the criteria was appropriate in order to balance the benefits and potential risks of the procedure. We did not uphold Miss C's complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201706572 as a PDF (10.96 KB) Updated: December 2, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Tayside NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202412006 01 Feb 2026 C complained on behalf of their child (A) who is in their late teens. C complained that Child and Adolescent … Upheld
202500322 01 Feb 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their late spouse (A) during their admission to hospital. A was … Partly Upheld
202405136 01 Dec 2025 C complained about the care and treatment that they received during an admission to hospital. C attended A&E and the … Upheld
202301846 01 Sep 2025 C complained about the treatment provided to their late parent (A) when they attended hospital with shortness of breath and … Partly Upheld
202310542 01 Aug 2025 C complained about the treatment provided to their partner (A) when they were admitted to hospital. A presented to the … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation