Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Fife NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201706036 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 July 2018

View NHS Fife scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C's husband (Mr A) underwent minor surgery at Victoria Hospital. He was discharged the same day, but died of a blood clot in the lungs two weeks after his surgery. Mrs C complained that the aftercare provided to Mr A was unreasonable. Specifically, she was concerned that Mr A should have been kept in overnight after the surgery, and she felt that when he came home from hospital he was not breathing properly.

We took independent advice from a surgeon. We found that a risk assessment tool had not been filled in. If it had been, it would have shown that Mr A had a number of risk factors for blood clots. This in turn should have led to the consideration of the use of a variety of preventative measures including Flowtron  boots (boots to prevent blod clotting), TED stockings (stockings used to try and prevent blood clots) and heparin (a medication which reduces the ability of the blood to clot), though we noted that these measures may not have changed the eventual outcome. Inconsistencies in the documentation meant that it was unclear if Flowtron boots or TED stockings had been used to prevent venous thrombo-embolism (VTE, or blood clots in the veins), however it was clear that heparin was not considered. We found that it was reasonable not to keep Mr A in hospital overnight, and did not consider that this would have changed the outcome. We found that there were likely to be other reasons for Mr A's breathlessness after the surgery, and did not consider that the blood clot would have been present so soon after surgery.

On balance, we considered that the aftercare provided to Mr A was unreasonable and we upheld Mrs C's complaint.

The board said that this complaint had alerted them to inconsistencies in practices, and confirmed that they were undertaking a review with a view to standardising and ensuring guidelines were followed. We asked for evidence of this and we also made some recommendations.

Recommendations

What we asked the organisation to do in this case: Apologise to Mrs C for the poor record-keeping, and for failing to consider the use of heparin after Mr A's surgery. The apology should meet the standards set out in the SPSO guidelines on apology available at www.spso.org.uk/leaflets-and-guidance.

What we said should change to put things right in future: Staff should ensure that patients' documentation is completed at every stage of their admission. The General Surgery VTE/Risk Assessment Tool should be completed for all patients.

Staff in the day surgery unit should be clear about the board's policy for dealing with the presence of risk factors for VTE in day case surgery. (While  the board are reviewing this matter, interim measures should be in place to ensure that appropriate steps are being taken when risk factors are present).

We have asked the organisation to provide us with evidence that they have implemented the recommendations we have made on this case by the deadline we set.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201706036 as a PDF (14.56 KB) Updated: December 2, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Fife NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202410341 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided by the board in relation to a cancerous lesion (squamous cell carcinoma, … Upheld
202308194 01 Dec 2025 C complained that the board’s mental health services did not communicate information regarding C's adult child (A) reasonably. A, who … Upheld
202402736 01 Dec 2025 C complained on behalf of their spouse (A). The first of C’s complaints was that the board had failed to … Partly Upheld
202404687 01 Sep 2025 C complained about the care and treatment provided by the board in relation to excision of a right sided neck … Upheld
202305480 01 Sep 2025 C complained about the nursing care provided to their late parent (A) whilst in hospital. They complained about a lack … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation