Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201601924 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 August 2017

View NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Ms C, who works for an advocacy and support agency, complained on behalf of her client (Mr A) about the care and treatment provided by the board to his late wife (Mrs A). Ms C complained that there was an avoidable delay in the board diagnosing Mrs A with pancreatic cancer and that there was a delay in carrying out a scan.

During our investigation we took independent advice from a medical adviser. We found that the actions of the board had been reasonable and that there was no delay in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer as Mrs A had not been presenting with symptoms which would alert clinicians to a suspicion of this diagnosis. We also found that it was reasonable that a scan was arranged on an out-patient basis and there was no undue delay in carrying out the scan. Therefore, we did not uphold Ms C's complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201601924 as a PDF (10.99 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - A…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202405247 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their parent (A). A had dementia and had suffered several falls. … Partly Upheld
202502009 01 May 2026 C complained that they were inappropriately triaged at A&E because sepsis had not been considered, their symptoms and history were … Not Upheld
202409771 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided by nursing staff to their late sibling (A), who was admitted to … Upheld
202406274 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment of their adult child (A) following A’s admission to hospital. A had a … Partly Upheld
202405343 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment that their late partner (A) received from the board’s gynaecology and oncology services … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation