Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Student Awards Agency for Scotland

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201508696 Sector Scottish Government and Devolved Administration Category handling of application Decided 01 August 2016

View Student Awards Agency for Scotland scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Miss C complained that the Student Awards Agency for Scotland (SAAS) unreasonably rejected her compelling personal reasons supporting her appeal for student funding.

We found that 'compelling personal reasons' was a phrase used by other student funding bodies and on websites giving advice on student funding, but it was not used by SAAS. Miss C had already been allocated all of the funding she was entitled to, and she did not meet the criteria for any funding concessions. Therefore, there was no further funding SAAS could award her. While Miss C was entitled to submit an appeal to SAAS, she did not meet their grounds for appeal and, therefore, her appeal was rejected by SAAS. We did not uphold Miss C's complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201508696 as a PDF (10.93 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Student Awards Agency for Scotland

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202111792 01 Nov 2022 C complained about the withdrawal of their student award by the Student Awards Agency for Scotland (SAAS). SAAS acknowledged errors … Resolved / Early Resolution
201800870 01 Oct 2018 Mrs C complained about the Student Awards Agency for Scotland (SAAS)'s handling of her application for funding. Mrs C applied … Not Upheld
201507640 01 Jun 2016 Mrs C applied for and was awarded student funding, including a dependants' grant, for the academic year 2014/15 by the … Not Upheld
201201461 01 Feb 2013 Mr C complained about the way in which the Student Awards Agency for Scotland (SAAS) handled his appeal against their … Partly Upheld
201104415 01 Aug 2012 Ms C complained that the Student Awards Agency for Scotland (SAAS) unreasonably refused her funding for a course, despite advising … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation