Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Forth Valley NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201508273 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 July 2016

View NHS Forth Valley scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C complained about the level of pain she experienced during a colonoscopy procedure (an examination of the bowel with a camera on a flexible tube) at Forth Valley Royal Hospital. Mrs C's pain was very bad and the procedure had to be stopped. Mrs C felt that the level of pain that she experienced was caused by failure to give her appropriate sedative and pain medication prior to the procedure. Mrs C highlighted that she had previously undergone the same procedure at another hospital with no ill effects.

After taking independent advice from a consultant colorectal surgeon, we did not uphold Mrs C's complaint. The adviser reviewed the medication that Mrs C received prior to the procedure and confirmed that this was appropriate. The adviser noted that Mrs C had previously had a similar procedure at another hospital and advised that whilst the reasons why this type of investigation can be successful for the same patient on one day but not another are not clear but that is sometimes the case. It was also noted that Mrs C had undergone major abdominal surgery in the past and the adviser explained that adhesions (scar tissue that can make tissues or organs inside the body stick together) can cause pain during colonoscopy procedures.

Although Mrs C's complaint was not upheld, the adviser pointed out that some of the patient information and other guidance did not appear to be current or was due for review, and also that the consent form for the procedure had not been countersigned. We made a number of recommendations to address these issues.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board: review their internal guidance and patient information leaflets in relation to colonoscopy procedures to ensure they are current; confirm the adviser's comments will be considered during the next review of the pre-procedure patient information leaflet and consent form; and take steps to ensure that all endoscopy consent forms are appropriately countersigned.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201508273 as a PDF (13.23 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Forth Valley NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202500014 01 Jun 2026 C complained that the board failed to report an injury to their spouse (A)'s wrist. A was in hospice care … Partly Upheld
202401232 01 May 2026 C, an independent advocate, complained on behalf of B, about the standard of medical and nursing care provided to B’s … Partly Upheld
202405861 01 Feb 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their infant child (A) who was born with a terminal genetic … Not Upheld
202402894 01 Jan 2026 C complained on behalf of their partner (A) about the care and treatment that A received from the board during … Partly Upheld
202403721 01 Jan 2026 C complained on behalf of their sibling (A) in relation to the care and treatment that the board provided to … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation