Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

The City of Edinburgh Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201508261 Sector Local Government Category statutory notices Decided 01 July 2017

View City of Edinburgh Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained about the council's handling of five outstanding statutory notices which had been issued in respect of his property prior to his purchase of the property. In particular, Mr C complained that the council had failed to notify his solicitor of one of the statutory notices when he was considering purchasing the property. The council apologised to Mr C that, due to an error, Mr C's solicitor had not been provided with information on this statutory notice. However, they provided evidence that full information on all the outstanding statutory notices had been provided to the previous owner and their solicitor, including the statutory notice in question. Given that the information had been provided to one of the two parties in the sale of the property, we considered that information on the statutory notice should have been available when Mr C was purchasing the property. The council's position, based on legal advice they had obtained, was that they were entitled to pursue Mr C for the debt outstanding on this statutory notice. While we upheld the complaint, given the action taken by the council to apologise to Mr C we made no further recommendations.

Mr C also complained that the council had failed to provide his solicitor with an accurate estimate of the costs of the other four outstanding statutory notices. Mr C complained that the figure given to his solicitor increased substantially in the final invoice. The council provided evidence of information that had been provided on the estimated costs of the other four outstanding statutory notices, including advice that the final cost was still being calculated. They further explained that a search of their records had provided no documentation detailing the estimate of cost suggested by Mr C. In the absence of evidence that written confirmation was provided by the council that the cost for the works would be as suggested by Mr C, we did not uphold the complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201508261 as a PDF (11.36 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving The City of Edinburgh Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202505687 01 Jun 2026 C complained to the council about damp and mould in their rental property. C had been moved to the property … Upheld
202404014 01 Feb 2026 C complained that the council did not properly consider their concerns about work being carried out on a neighbour’s summerhouse … Not Upheld
202302915 01 Apr 2025 A & B complained to the council about their handling of their claims procedure in relation to the Trams to … Upheld
202303840 01 Oct 2024 C is the grandparent of A and B, whose parents were separated. C complained about the actions of the council … Partly Upheld
202301380 01 Aug 2024 C complained about the council’s social work service during the pre-adoptive process of their child (A). C complained about the … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation