Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Clackmannanshire Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201508197 Sector Local Government Category policy/administration Decided 01 September 2016

View Clackmannanshire Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C had previously paved his entire front garden to make a driveway and was given permission from the council to double the length of his dropped kerb to access this area. Mr C said he had difficulty accessing his drive and wished to further extend the dropped kerb. Mr C complained that the council unreasonably failed to appropriately assess his application to extend the drop kerb outside his home.

In considering Mr C's complaint, our role was to determine whether the council followed their normal process when dealing with Mr C's application. It was not our role to assess the site in question and determine whether or not Mr C's application should have been approved – that was the council's discretionary decision.

We saw no evidence that there was any visit made by a council officer to the site in question prior to giving his initial decision to refuse Mr C's application, although the council said a visit was made. When Mr C questioned the officer's decision it appeared that the council assessed Mr C's application in accordance with their normal process, with the council officer's manager assessing the site in question and setting out his professional opinion on why the application had been refused. On balance, we did not consider that the council unreasonably failed to appropriately assess Mr C's application.

However, the evidence showed that the council failed to keep adequate records on the case and deal with Mr C's concerns about their handling of his application and the actions of council staff appropriately. We made recommendations to address this.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: feed back the failings identified in our decision to the staff involved; take steps to ensure that in future cases of this type, records of site visits and phone conversations regarding applications are kept and complainants are appropriately directed to their complaints procedure; and provide Mr C with a written apology for the failings identified.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201508197 as a PDF (13.24 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Clackmannanshire Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202109957 01 Mar 2024 C complained about the way that the council handled the planning process and the building warrant process for a self-build … Not Upheld
202106700 01 Jul 2023 C complained about the council’s planning department with respect to a section 75 agreement (a contract that is entered into … Upheld
201804660 01 Oct 2019 Mrs C complained about the council's response to the child protection concerns raised in respect of her child (Child A). … Upheld
201809898 01 Sep 2019 Mr C complained about the support provided to him by the council following his release on licence from prison. Mr … Not Upheld
201801434 01 Aug 2019 Mr C complained about the council's decision to significantly increase fees for musical tuition. He considered the council had not … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation