Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Glasgow City Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201508015 Sector Local Government Category parking Decided 01 January 2017

View Glasgow City Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained to us about parking tickets that he had received from the council. Mr C had appealed some of the charges but the council had rejected his appeal. He then appealed the charges to the independent body that deals with appeals but at that stage, the council decided not to contest his appeal.

Mr C complained to us that the council had failed to action his report of faulty ticket machines. We found that the council had delayed in correcting the signs on the machines about the coins they would accept and we upheld this part of Mr C's complaint. He also complained about the council's handling of the appeals. We found that although Mr C had been inconvenienced by the fact that he had to submit a second appeal to the independent body, the decisions taken on the appeals by the council were decisions they were entitled to take and there was no evidence of procedural failings. Mr C also complained that the council had not told him why they had decided not to contest his appeal. However, this was also a decision they were entitled to take. We did not uphold these aspects of Mr C's complaint.

Mr C complained that the council had failed to respond reasonably to issues he had raised about the legal position of the parking spaces. We found that the council's response to him on this matter had been reasonable and proportionate. We did not uphold this complaint.

Finally, Mr C complained that the council had not followed their complaints procedure when dealing with his complaints. We found that there had been delays in dealing with Mr C's complaint. The council had only recorded the matter as a complaint after this office became involved. We also found that the council had not adequately responded to all of the issues he raised. We upheld this aspect of Mr C's complaint.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: issue a written apology to Mr C for the delay in correcting the signage and the failures in relation to the handling of his complaint; provide evidence to confirm that in future, where required, the signage on parking meter machines will be updated promptly; and confirm that the staff involved in handling Mr C's complaints have been made aware of our decisions.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201508015 as a PDF (13.2 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Glasgow City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202308932 01 Apr 2025 C complained about their experience at the primary school of their child (A) who has additional support needs. C requested … Upheld
202008542 01 Jan 2023 C, a taxi driver, complained about the way the council had handled their medical examination which they were required to … Upheld
202105309 01 Mar 2022 C complained about the council's handling of their complaints about their child (A) being bullied at their school by another … Partly Upheld
201905590 01 Dec 2020 C complained about the council’s handling of their correspondence in relation to an alleged bus lane contravention. C said that … Upheld
201901663 01 Sep 2020 C applied for a community care grant from the Scottish Welfare Fund (SWF) at the council. C's application was refused … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation