Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Dentist in the Lothian NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201507822 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 November 2016

Full decision

Summary

Miss C attended her dentist and reported mild discomfort in an upper tooth. Following an examination including x-rays, Miss C was advised that she required either extraction or root canal treatment of the tooth. Miss C chose to proceed with the root canal treatment which was carried out a few weeks later. Afterwards, Miss C experienced pain and swelling that resulted in her attending at the local out-of-hours service, where she received antibiotics for an abscess. Miss C returned to the dentist and was unhappy with the follow-up service.

After taking independent dental advice we did not uphold Miss C's complaint. We found no failings in the care and treatment that Miss C was provided with. The advice we received was that the treatment provided was appropriate and that the risk of the abscess had been covered in the risks and benefits information provided to her.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201507822 as a PDF (11.02 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Dentist in the Lothian NHS Board area

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202411526 01 Nov 2025 C complained about the dental care and treatment that they received. C underwent root canal treatment (RCT) on their lower … Upheld
201805751 01 Mar 2020 Ms C complained to us that a dentist had failed to provide reasonable care and treatment to her. She said … Upheld
201805548 01 May 2019 Miss C complained about the treatment she received from her dentist. She said that she had presented with a small … Not Upheld
201700458 01 Dec 2017 Mr C attended his dentist over a period of months for treatment for severe tooth pain. The dentist extracted one … Upheld
201606479 01 Aug 2017 Ms C complained that her dentist failed to give her appropriate treatment. In particular, she complained that the dentist may … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation