Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Dumfries and Galloway NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201507722 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 June 2016

View NHS Dumfries & Galloway scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C's mother (Mrs A) was admitted to the Medical Assessment Unit (MAU) at Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary via A&E after showing signs of a stroke. Whilst in hospital, Mrs A suffered a major stroke. Mrs C raised a number of complaints about the board, including that they unreasonably failed to give Mrs A a clot buster rtPA (an injection to break down blood clots) and that nursing staff failed to monitor Mrs A appropriately.

We obtained independent medical advice from a consultant physician and a nurse. The medical adviser said that the board unreasonably failed to give Mrs A a clot buster rtPA, although they said that the decision would have been a difficult one and would have had to have been made by a specialist.

In addition, the medical adviser said that when Mrs A was in A&E, the board should have carried out a specific risk categorisation using the ABCD2 score (a risk assessment tool designed to improve the prediction of short-term stroke risk after a 'mini stroke'). Had they done so, this would have shown that Mrs A was at very high risk of progression to acute stroke. The medical adviser also said that Mrs A should have been admitted to an acute stroke unit and given a carotid Doppler (a scan to detect a narrowed artery in the neck, which may cause a stroke). She should also have been monitored continuously by experienced staff, rather than being admitted to the MAU. The medical adviser also said that a plan should have been made for Mrs A's care in the event of a deterioration, which should also have been explicit about what to do if new stroke deficits were detected.

Both advisers said the nursing staff did not monitor Mrs A appropriately or observe her every two hours, as required. The medical adviser said that the scoring system used by staff to monitor Mrs A (the Glasgow Coma Scale or GCS) was not entirely suitable. The nursing adviser said that not taking Mrs A's vital signs for a period of over five hours was a serious failing. We upheld Mrs C's complaints and made a number of recommendations to address the failings we identified.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board: feed back the failings identified regarding the clot buster rtPA, the ABCD2 score, carotid Doppler and admission to an acute stroke unit to the staff involved; identify and address training needs for staff in A&E and the MAU on guideline 108 of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; provide Mrs C and her family with a written apology for the failings identified in the first recommendation; feed back the failings identified in Mrs A's nursing care to the staff involved; complete their review of the use of the GCS score, taking into consideration the medical adviser's views, and provide us with evidence of the outcome of the review; and provide Mrs C and her family with a written apology for the failings identified.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201507722 as a PDF (14.62 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Dumfries and Galloway NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202304648 01 Feb 2026 C complained that the board failed to reasonably communicate with them about the care and treatment of their parent (A). … Not Upheld
202404622 01 Sep 2025 C complained about the care and treatment the board provided to their late spouse (A). A had a history of … Partly Upheld
202303239 01 Jun 2025 C complained about the medical care provided to their late parent (A) by the board when they were admitted to … Upheld
202301151 01 Apr 2025 C’s adult child (A) had been referred to the board's Community Mental Health Team (CMHT). A had some contact with … Upheld
202308046 01 Mar 2025 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their late spouse (A). C complained that A had an infected … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation