Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Aberdeenshire Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201507707 Sector Local Government Category policy/administration Decided 01 February 2017

View Aberdeenshire Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Ms C complained about the council's handling of asset transfers to two local charities, as she did not believe that the council had completed appropriate Equality Impact Assessments (EIA)s as required under the Equality Act 2010. She believed that they had only completed one EIA, which failed to consider all of the protected groups defined in the Act.

On investigation, we found that the council had completed EIAs for both asset transfers. On the first of these assessments, one area of the form used had only been partially completed, giving the initial impression that only some protected groups had been assessed. However, after reviewing their records in full, we were satisfied, on balance, that the council had considered all of the areas required. As such, we shared this minor error with the council but did not uphold this complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201507707 as a PDF (10.99 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Aberdeenshire Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202302482 01 Dec 2024 C complained that the council had failed to keep their child (A) safe whilst in the council’s care and that … Partly Upheld
202110015 01 May 2024 C complained that the council had unreasonably failed to follow their own enforcement process and relevant planning guidance in response … Not Upheld
202102930 01 Aug 2023 C complained about the council's drainage assessment for a planning application. They said it only considered the likely impact of … Not Upheld
202109163 01 Jul 2023 C’s child (A), was a pupil at a school in the council’s area. C said that A experienced bullying and … Partly Upheld
202108990 01 Jul 2023 C complained that the council failed to provide support to them and their child (A), who had a severe and … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation