Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Medical Practice in the Highland NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201507683 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 May 2017

Full decision

Summary

Mr C, who received treatment for high blood pressure and kidney disease, complained that GPs at his medical practice had not monitored his blood pressure reasonably, and that this had caused damage to his kidneys. In response to Mr C's complaint, the practice said that his blood pressure had been monitored in accordance with the relevant guidelines.

We took independent medical advice. The adviser was satisfied that it was appropriate for the practice to measure Mr C's blood pressure at whatever time he attended for an appointment and noted that there was no requirement in the guidelines stating that blood pressure cannot be taken in the morning, or after a patient's medication has been taken. The adviser considered that both Mr C's blood pressure and kidney function had been monitored with reasonable regularity and in accordance with the relevant requirements. Furthermore, the adviser did not have concerns about the medication prescribed to Mr C by the practice and concluded that there was no evidence that the practice had failed to adequately monitor Mr C's blood pressure or that their actions had contributed to reduced kidney function. We therefore did not uphold this aspect of Mr C's complaint.

Mr C also complained that the practice did not respond reasonably to his complaint. In response to our enquiries, the practice identified that some of the complaint correspondence did not meet a number of the requirements of the Patients Rights (Scotland) Act 2011. The practice told us that the practice manager had undertaken to fully familiarise themselves with the requirements of the Act and that they would update the practice's complaints procedure to reflect the requirements. Although we found that many aspects of the practice's handling of the complaint were reasonable, we were critical that the practice had not followed the guidance in relation to acknowledging complaints and updating complainants after a delay. We therefore upheld this aspect of Mr C's complaint.

Recommendations

We recommended that the practice: apologise to Mr C for failing to handle his complaint in accordance with the relevant guidance; and provide this office with a copy of their updated complaints procedure.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201507683 as a PDF (12.95 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Medical Practice in the Highland NHS …

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202205437 01 Nov 2023 C complained on behalf of B about the care and treatment provided to B's spouse (A) by the practice. A … Upheld
201910988 01 Aug 2021 C complained on behalf of their parent (A) about the care and treatment A received from their GP practice; in … Not Upheld
201909321 01 Aug 2021 C's parent (A) developed breathing difficulties and underwent investigations and treatment, including hospital admission, for bilateral pneumonia (inflammation of both … Not Upheld
201907395 01 Nov 2020 C complained about the care they received from their GP practice when they presented with problems with their sight and … Not Upheld
201808254 01 Jun 2020 Mr and Mrs C complained on behalf of their daughter (Ms A) that the care and treatment Ms A received … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation