Summary
Mr C complained about the care and treatment received by his late brother (Mr A) in relation to Mr A's lung cancer and his admission to Forth Valley Royal Hospital following a cardiac arrest.
During our investigation we took independent advice from two advisers, a consultant in respiratory medicine and a consultant in anaesthesia and critical care medicine.
The board accepted that there had been unnecessary delays in Mr A's cancer care pathway, for which they apologised and outlined the action taken. The consultant in respiratory medicine said that while some delays had been unavoidable, others were unexplained and unreasonable, in particular the delays relating to the referral from primary care to secondary care. They also noted poor communication. We therefore upheld this aspect of Mr C's complaint. However, the advice we received from the consultant in anaesthesia and critical care medicine was that the decisions taken following Mr A's admittance to the hospital and the care and treatment he received were reasonable.
Recommendations
We recommended that the board: consider the adviser's comments in relation to the delays experienced by Mr C's brother, in particular the referral from primary care to secondary care and poor communication, to see what further lessons can be learned.
Related reading
View Decision Report 201507571 as a PDF (12.16 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018