Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Medical Practice in the Dumfries and Galloway NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201503835 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 February 2016

Full decision

Summary

Over a period of time, Ms C began to experience constant bloating, was unable to lose weight and was concerned about other symptoms. She attended her GP, who examined her stomach and said there was excess fluid but he was not concerned. The GP's note of this consultation said that Ms C was doing well with her diet, had lost three stone, but felt she was putting weight on despite not changing anything. He arranged routine blood tests which came back normal. Ms C's symptoms got worse. A few weeks later she attended a different GP. The GP found what she thought was a cyst on Ms C's left ovary and a scan confirmed this. Surgery removed a very large (30 centimetres by 24 centimetres) cyst. Ms C complained that the care and treatment she received from the first GP was inadequate.

We sought independent advice from a GP adviser. The adviser considered the relevant General Medical Council (GMC), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. They concluded that the note of the appointment was not of a reasonable standard as it was sparse in detail, showed evidence of only a very limited recorded history, and no evidence of a medical examination. The adviser explained that Ms C's symptoms required examination and follow-up, neither of which was recorded. They also considered that the note did not show evidence of good communication or working in partnership with patients so it was not of a reasonable standard. The adviser explained that, in line with SIGN and NICE guidance on the investigations needed to exclude ovarian cancer, Ms C should have had a particular blood test and a scan. Therefore, we found that reasonable investigations were not carried out.

We upheld Ms C's complaint and made several recommendations.

Recommendations

We recommended that the practice: ensure the GP apologises to Ms C for the specific failings identified by our investigation; ensure the GP familiarises himself with the SIGN and NICE guidelines in relation to the presenting features of possible ovarian cancer, and identifies this as a learning need for his yearly appraisal; ensure the GP reviews his medical record-keeping and provides evidence of improvement; ensure the GP reviews and reflects on his communication with patients; and ensure they make certain their complaints handling procedure is fully compliant with the Patient Rights (Scotland) Act 2011 and the Scottish Government 'Can I help you?' guidance.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201503835 as a PDF (14.34 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Medical Practice in the Dumfries and …

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202002090 01 Jan 2021 C complained on behalf of their spouse (A) about the treatment provided to them. A had a history of cancer … Not Upheld
201803700 01 May 2019 Mrs C complained about the care and treatment given to her late husband (Mr A) by the practice before his … Not Upheld
201804677 01 Apr 2019 Mrs C complained about the care provided to her late husband (Mr A) by the practice. Mr A who suffered … Not Upheld
201700272 01 May 2018 Mr C attended his GP practice with symptoms of fatigue, reduced appetite and night sweats. Tests indicated an infection and … Not Upheld
201508145 01 Sep 2016 Mr C complained that a GP practice did not properly maintain the medical records of his wife (Mrs A) and … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation