Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Medical Practice in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201502640 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 January 2016

Full decision

Summary

Mr C visited the practice about his cough. He was referred for an x-ray, which took place the following day. Mr C contacted the practice three times for the results and was told that they had not arrived. Mr C's symptoms worsened and he was admitted to hospital with pneumonia and heart failure. Mr C complained that the practice did not have adequate procedures in place to identify that his x-ray report was missing.

Normally, a paper copy of the x-ray report would be sent to the practice and uploaded to the practice's information management system. In this case, for reasons we were unable to establish, the report was not uploaded. This suggests the report may not have been received. The GP at the practice was able to access the report through the hospital's computer system when they realised that the report had not been received. However, the GP was only prompted to do this after receiving notification of Mr C's hospitalisation.

The practice apologised to Mr C and explained that there was a gap in their protocols for occasions when information was not received in the normal way. They explained that they had updated their protocols for dealing with patient phone calls regarding x-ray results. The new protocol meant that, if a patient contacted the practice three weeks or more after an x-ray for which no report had been received, reception staff would advise the GP who requested the x-ray. The GP would then check for the report on the hospital's computer system. The practice were also piloting a new process to keep copies of x-ray requests with the aim of ensuring the practice followed up on any results not received after four weeks.

We took independent advice from a GP adviser. We found that the practice did not have adequate procedures in place to identify that Mr C's x-ray report was missing and so we upheld his complaint. We recognised that the practice had apologised and made changes to their protocols to prevent a recurrence, and we felt that there were no further actions required.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201502640 as a PDF (11.55 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Medical Practice in the Greater Glasg…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202502789 01 Jun 2026 C complained that they were unreasonably removed from the practice list. Practices are entitled to remove patients from their lists … Upheld
202501958 01 Jun 2026 C complained about the actions taken by a GP after attending the practice with sudden hearing loss. The GP initially … Not Upheld
202403301 01 Oct 2025 C had concerns about the care and treatment that their late parent (A) received from the practice. At the time … Partly Upheld
202309340 01 Jun 2025 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their late parent (A). A had a terminal illness and was … Upheld
202310446 01 Mar 2025 C complained about the care and treatment that their adult child (A) received from the practice following their discharge from … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation