Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Dental Practice in the Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201407750 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 September 2015

Full decision

Summary

Ms C attended her dental practice complaining of pain from her molar tooth. Ms C elected to have an extraction, which was performed under local anaesthetic. During the extraction, the tooth fractured and part of the root was displaced into the maxillary antrum (the space within the upper jaw bone). This had to be removed by surgery. Ms C said it was not reasonable that the tooth fractured during the extraction because the dentist had an x-ray showing the size of the tooth and its position before undertaking the procedure. Ms C complained that she had to attend hospital eight times because she suffered a severe infection which disfigured one side of her face and caused extreme pain.

We took independent advice from our dental adviser. We found that there was no indication that the fractured root would become dislodged and penetrate the antrum, and that this was a well recognised complication of this kind of extraction. However, there was no evidence in Mrs C's dental records that the possible complications of the extraction had been explained to her before the procedure had been carried out. While we were satisfied by the evidence that, overall, the treatment decisions and management were reasonable, we made a recommendation to the practice given the lack of evidence showing that possible complications were explained.

Recommendations

We recommended that the practice: take steps to ensure the possible risks of extraction are adequately explained to patients and recorded in their records.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201407750 as a PDF (12.31 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Dental Practice in the Ayrshire and A…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201103955 01 Oct 2012 Mr C was dissatisfied after treatment from two dentists during 2010. He complained by telephone in January 2011. He also … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation