Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Falkirk Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201406106 Sector Local Government Category policy/administration Decided 01 December 2015

View Falkirk Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Ms C, a solicitor, complained to us on behalf of her clients, Mr and Mrs A. Mr and Mrs A were unhappy with the council's actions relating to a compulsory purchase order and repairs to a core path. A number of the issues complained of occurred outwith the last twelve months and we did not pursue those matters further. We upheld a complaint that the council failed to advise Mr and Mrs A promptly when the council revised their view on repairing the core path and began to consider a compulsory purchase order. We recommended that the council apologise to Mr and Mrs A for this delay, which they did. We did not uphold complaints about the council's overall communication with Mr and Mrs A.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: apologise to Mr and Mrs A for not advising them in a timely manner of their revised position in relation to their right to enter Mr and Mrs A's land without their permission.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201406106 as a PDF (11.96 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Falkirk Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202307184 01 Oct 2025 C, a council tenant, complained that the council had failed to replace their kitchen, which was outdated and in a … Partly Upheld
202403907 01 May 2025 C complained that the council unreasonably failed to assess their housing application in accordance with their policies and procedures. C … Upheld
202402009 01 Apr 2025 C complained to the council that they had unlawfully carried out repairs to the communal roof and chimney of a … Upheld
201900986 01 Mar 2023 C complained about the service provided by the council's social work service in connection with their child (A), who resided … Upheld
201910292 01 Apr 2022 C is the owner of a 'four-in-a-block' flat and the other three properties in the block are owned by the … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation