Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

The City of Edinburgh Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201403465 Sector Local Government Category complaints handling Decided 01 September 2015

View City of Edinburgh Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Miss C complained that the council failed to properly investigate when she complained to them that she had been knocked off her bicycle by a council employee who opened his van door directly into her path. She complained that the driver did not stop to make sure she was unhurt. She said he said that she should have rung her bell and he then left in his van. She also complained to our office about the significant length of time it had taken the council to respond to her complaint. The council eventually wrote to Miss C to advise that they were unable to trace the van or driver from the details Miss C had provided and could not, therefore, accept any liability for the incident.

Although the issue of liability in an accident like this can only be determined by the courts, we did look into the background of the case in order to establish whether or not the council's investigations into the incident were reasonable, and whether they had dealt with Miss C's complaint appropriately.

We found that the council did conduct an investigation to identify the van and driver involved but, on the basis of the limited information provided by Miss C, they were unable to identify the vehicle or driver. We found their investigations to be reasonable. However, we noted that the council initially failed completely to respond to Miss C's complaint and, when they did contact her, this was through the claims process rather than the complaints process. We noted that the council did not respond to the questions Miss C raised in her complaint even after prompting by our office. It was not until we had begun our investigation that the council finally wrote to Miss C to answer her questions and to provide information about how to complain to our office. As a result of these failings, and the significant delay in responding to her complaint (around 15 months), we upheld this aspect of the complaint. We recommended to the council that they review their procedures, in light of our findings, in order to ensure that complaints are directed to the relevant team for response.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: review the process they follow, in light of the circumstances of this case, when identifying and acknowledging complaints to ensure that in future, complaints such as these are passed to the appropriate service for response in line with their complaints procedure, and let us know when this review is complete.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201403465 as a PDF (12.69 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving The City of Edinburgh Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202505687 01 Jun 2026 C complained to the council about damp and mould in their rental property. C had been moved to the property … Upheld
202404014 01 Feb 2026 C complained that the council did not properly consider their concerns about work being carried out on a neighbour’s summerhouse … Not Upheld
202302915 01 Apr 2025 A & B complained to the council about their handling of their claims procedure in relation to the Trams to … Upheld
202303840 01 Oct 2024 C is the grandparent of A and B, whose parents were separated. C complained about the actions of the council … Partly Upheld
202301380 01 Aug 2024 C complained about the council’s social work service during the pre-adoptive process of their child (A). C complained about the … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation