Summary
Mr C complained about some dental work he had done. He was unhappy because he did not think he had been given sufficient information about the procedure. He had a replacement bridge fitted (a device to replace a missing tooth), and was unhappy with the colour and size of the crown. Mr C was also concerned that, when the dentist tried to remove the crown, he was unable to do so.
We took independent dental advice on this complaint. The adviser noted that it was not clear exactly what information Mr C had been given in relation to his proposed treatment, because there was not enough detail in his notes. However, he said that from the evidence available, it was reasonable for the dentist to have suggested that a new bridge was necessary. He also said that, while the replacement bridge had not been an appropriate fit, the dentist had taken appropriate action in offering to replace it. He also noted that crowns can be difficult to remove, and that the dentist had acted with appropriate caution in choosing to drill the crown off, rather than try and remove it by force.
On the basis of the advice we received, we were satisfied that, while Mr C's dental treatment was not as straightforward as Mr C would have liked, the dentist's actions were reasonable, and he acted in Mr C's best interests.
Recommendations
We recommended that the dentist: review current record-keeping standards and take steps to ensure these are applied in practice.
Related reading
View Decision Report 201401612 as a PDF (12.29 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018