Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201305828 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 October 2014

View NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C complained on behalf of her mother (Mrs A) that staff at Inverclyde Royal Hospital provided inadequate care and treatment to her. Mrs C also complained that communication from hospital staff was not good enough. Mrs A had started taking antibiotics for a urinary tract infection two days before admission, and was admitted to the hospital with increasing confusion. Mrs C was particularly concerned about a fall her mother had in hospital, as well as treatment for Mrs A’s confusion.

We received Mrs A’s medical records from the board, and took independent advice from our nursing adviser. There was no dispute that Mrs A fell; what was disputed was the reason for the fall. In this case, we could not resolve the dispute given the differing accounts of what happened, although that did not mean we believed one version over another. In Mrs C’s view, the fall was not addressed properly. The medical records showed that Mrs A was assessed after the fall, and no major injuries were found. Our adviser’s view, which we accepted, was that the care provided to Mrs A was reasonable in the circumstances. Based on the available evidence, we concluded that hospital staff provided adequate care and treatment to Mrs A.

The board said they should have phoned Mrs C earlier to tell her about Mrs A’s fall, and they apologised for this and reminded staff of the importance of keeping patients and relatives informed. We found evidence in the medical records that staff spoke to Mrs C regularly during Mrs A’s stay in hospital, and that they were aware Mrs C was unhappy. Our adviser observed that staff could have tried to offer more support to Mrs C when she was visibly upset. However, we decided that, on balance, communication from hospital staff to Mrs C was adequate in the circumstances.

Although we did not uphold Mrs C’s complaints, we made recommendations to address specific concerns raised by our adviser.

Recommendations

We recommended that the Board: reflect on this case, as part of ongoing improvements, to ensure that an appropriately detailed approach is taken to care planning to help manage delirium; and reflect on this case, as part of ongoing improvements, to ensure that staff provide support to relatives of patients with delirium.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201305828 as a PDF (13.1 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - A…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202405247 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their parent (A). A had dementia and had suffered several falls. … Partly Upheld
202502009 01 May 2026 C complained that they were inappropriately triaged at A&E because sepsis had not been considered, their symptoms and history were … Not Upheld
202409771 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided by nursing staff to their late sibling (A), who was admitted to … Upheld
202406274 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment of their adult child (A) following A’s admission to hospital. A had a … Partly Upheld
202405343 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment that their late partner (A) received from the board’s gynaecology and oncology services … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation