Summary
Mrs C took her young daughter (Miss A) to her medical practice as Miss A had a high temperature that would not come down, despite being given paracetamol. Mrs C said her daughter was shivering and was having difficulty catching her breath.
Mrs C said that at the appointment the GP described Miss A's condition as a chest infection and prescribed antibiotics. Miss A was later admitted to hospital suffering from pneumonia (a lung infection). Mrs C said that the GP should have told her that he suspected pneumonia, rather than describing her daughter's condition as a chest infection. She thought that her daughter should have been referred for further tests and investigations at the appointment, rather than being sent home with a prescription for antibiotics. Mrs C also said that the practice had failed to handle her complaint appropriately. She said that, at a meeting, the GP seemed more upset about her complaint than about Miss A's experience, which had left her traumatised with a fear of hospitals and doctors.
We took independent advice from one of our medical advisers. The adviser said that the evidence showed that the GP recorded a diagnosis of suspected pneumonia in his notes, and prescribed antibiotics for treatment at home, in line with national guidelines. He also said that there was no evidence that Miss A had not received an acceptable standard of care.
Our investigation also found that the practice carried out a thorough investigation into Mrs C's complaint. They provided an explanation for the remarks made by the GP at the meeting with Mrs C and where they identified learning points they took action to address them. We found that the practice had responded appropriately to Mrs C's complaint.
Related reading
View Decision Report 201304451 as a PDF (11.43 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018