Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201304301 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 August 2014

View NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C, who is an advice worker, complained on behalf of his client (Ms A) after the birth of her baby. He said that when Ms A was admitted to Glasgow Royal Infirmary to have the birth of her baby induced, staff did not fully consider her previous medical history, did not provide her with enough pain relief, and failed to adequately repair three tears that she sustained during the birth.

Our investigation, which included taking independent advice from one of our medical advisers, found that Ms A's previous history had been fully recorded. We also found that she was provided with appropriate medication to induce the birth of her child, taking into consideration her previous medical history, and that when she started having painful contractions, Ms A was provided with appropriate pain relief. However, her labour progressed very quickly and when she needed more pain relief, there was not enough time to assess her and provide an epidural (local anaesthetic injected into the spine). It was not safe to her unborn child to provide her with opiates (very strong pain killing drugs). While it was clear from the records that Ms A suffered a painful labour, our adviser said that the care and treatment provided was reasonable, appropriate and timely.

The tears Ms A sustained were repaired by a senior specialist trainee doctor, using local anaesthetic and inserting one or two stitches in each wound. The local anaesthetic had begun to wear off by the time the doctor was repairing the third tear, and Ms A was given the option to continue, or to have more local anaesthetic inserted. This in itself can be painful, and Ms A decided to go ahead without further anaesthetic. She later continued to have problems with pain and what she considered to be an unsightly result of the repair. Two months after the birth she went to an A&E department, where she was examined and referred for reconstructive surgery. Our medical adviser reviewed all the clinical notes from the birth and the reconstructive surgery and found no evidence that the problems Ms A suffered had been caused by poor technique during the original repair. The adviser explained that such tears are fairly common and often require reconstructive surgery some time after a birth. The adviser said that the doctor had used appropriate materials and technique, and there was no evidence of an inadequate repair.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201304301 as a PDF (11.74 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202205600 01 Aug 2023 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their late parent (A) by the board's out of hours (OOH) … Not Upheld
201803746 01 Nov 2019 Mrs C complained that the board's decision to not provide her child (Child A) with an emergency appointment was unreasonable. … Not Upheld
201802124 01 Oct 2019 Mr and Mrs C complained on behalf of their child (Child A) about the care and treatment they received from … Not Upheld
201708611 01 May 2019 Ms C raised concern about a number of issues in relation to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (the … Partly Upheld
201803350 01 Mar 2019 Ms C complained about the care and treatment she received at the GP out-of-hours service at Gartnavel General Hospital when … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation