Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

The Highland Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201302996 Sector Local Government Category primary school Decided 01 March 2015

View The Highland Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C complained that the council did not meet her child's additional support needs at school. She was also unhappy about how they handled her complaint.

Our investigation found that while the school recognised that Mrs C's child had additional support needs and that support was provided, there had been a complete breakdown in the relationship between Mrs C and the school. Because of this, the issue of whether appropriate support was being provided was never going to be resolved. Mrs C had clearly lost confidence in the service and support provided by the school, and had a genuine belief that it was failing to meet her child's needs.

Mrs C, therefore, had a right to be made aware of the alternative dispute resolution provision available under the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004, where there is a complaint that a school is not meeting a pupil's additional support needs. This includes access to independent mediation and adjudication, and an appeal to the Additional Support Needs Tribunal for Scotland. The council did eventually offer Mrs C access to mediation (which they should have offered sooner) but we found no evidence that they made her aware of her rights under the legislation as they should have done.

We also found that there were occasions when Mrs C's child went home from school during the day but these were not recorded as an exclusion from school as they should have been (in accordance with the council's school exclusion policy). Accounts of incidents at the school involving Mrs C's child were also not recorded at the time they occurred.

The council had acknowledged delay in responding to Mrs C’s complaint, for which they had apologised and advised her what they had done as a result of this. We were satisfied that they had taken appropriate action to address this part of the complaint. However, Mrs C had also raised concerns about her child being bullied. Given the seriousness of Mrs C's allegations, in particular that her child had been assaulted, we considered that the council had not carried out appropriate investigations to address the allegations of bullying.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: issue a written apology to Mrs C for the failings identified; ensure that all relevant staff are made aware of the alternative dispute resolution avenue available for complaints about schools failing to meet additional support needs; ensure that all relevant staff are made aware of the council's Management of Exclusion on Schools policy and what constitutes an 'exclusion' from school; and ensure that all relevant staff are made aware of the requirement to complete incident report forms, where appropriate.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201302996 as a PDF (13.83 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving The Highland Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202206966 01 Apr 2024 C was living in a residential unit for young people who are looked after by the council. C complained that … Partly Upheld
202107467 01 Dec 2023 C complained about the council’s handling of allegations that their child made against them, including decisions taken to remove their … Partly Upheld
202002615 01 Apr 2023 C complained about the council’s decision-making in relation to the allocation of Scottish Government Town Centre funding. In terms of … Upheld
201909583 01 May 2021 C complained about the council's social work department's handling of child protection concerns that were raised about their children and … Upheld
201810255 01 Jan 2021 C complained about the council's involvement in respect of the Welfare Guardianship Order (order which allows someone to make ongoing … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation