Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Scottish Borders Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201302325 Sector Local Government Category complaints handling Decided 01 March 2014

View Scottish Sports Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained about the way the council dealt with his complaint about their education services. He also complained that they unreasonably told him that they would no longer correspond with him by email.

Having reviewed the evidence, our investigation found that the council had responded to his complaints in line with their procedures. We noted, however, that they had given an incorrect reason for restricting his email contact, and had failed to ask him to reduce the level of email correspondence he was providing before restricting his contact with them. For this reason, we upheld this aspect of the complaint.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: write to Mr C to apologise for giving inaccurate reasons for restricting his email contact.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201302325 as a PDF (11.88 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Scottish Borders Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202206940 01 Sep 2024 C complained that the council unreasonably failed to investigate and respond appropriately to incidents of bullying behaviour towards their child … Upheld
202002441 01 May 2023 C cares for their spouse (A) who has Alzheimer's disease. C complained about the council's social work department, after they … Not Upheld
202003481 01 Oct 2022 C complained that social work failed to reasonably assess A’s needs following a hospital admission, in relation to whether they … Partly Upheld
201902069 01 Aug 2021 C complained about the council's social work involvement with their child (A). A had a range of conditions that affected … Upheld
201901597 01 Jun 2021 C complained that the council failed to provide kinship care allowance after they had moved into the area from England, … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation