View The Highland Council scorecard
Mr C complained that a council committee had gone beyond its remit under the council's scheme of delegation. He said that when considering whether to sell or rent out a property, the committee had altered a council officer's proposals and then approved those alterations.
Our investigation concluded that the committee's actions had not gone beyond their remit, and we did not uphold the complaint.
View Decision Report 201302289 as a PDF (10.76 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018
| Reference | Date | Summary | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 202206966 | 01 Apr 2024 | C was living in a residential unit for young people who are looked after by the council. C complained that … | Partly Upheld |
| 202107467 | 01 Dec 2023 | C complained about the council’s handling of allegations that their child made against them, including decisions taken to remove their … | Partly Upheld |
| 202002615 | 01 Apr 2023 | C complained about the council’s decision-making in relation to the allocation of Scottish Government Town Centre funding. In terms of … | Upheld |
| 201909583 | 01 May 2021 | C complained about the council's social work department's handling of child protection concerns that were raised about their children and … | Upheld |
| 201810255 | 01 Jan 2021 | C complained about the council's involvement in respect of the Welfare Guardianship Order (order which allows someone to make ongoing … | Not Upheld |