Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

The City of Edinburgh Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201301254 Sector Local Government Category statutory notices Decided 01 February 2014

View City of Edinburgh Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C owns a flat which he rents out. The flat is in a tenement that was the subject of a statutory notice in respect of roof repairs, served on owners in February 2007 under the provisions of The City of Edinburgh District Council Order Confirmation Act 1991. In May 2008, owners were told that in the absence of any agreement by owners to undertake the necessary works, the council had appointed a firm of surveyors to administer these. In October 2009 the surveyors told owners that the contract had been awarded, and told them the estimated costs, start date and duration. The works were carried out by October 2010. During the contract, the surveyors made regular site visits, paid out progressive instalments of the contract fee and sent a number of update newsletters to owners. Accounts for the share of the costs were sent to owners in December 2012.

Mr C had not received any of the previous correspondence, and said that he only became aware of the works when his tenant forwarded the invoice. He made information requests to the council, and complained to them. He then complained to us that the council failed to take reasonable steps to notify him of the statutory notice served on his property, and to demonstrate that they followed their own procedures when evaluating and controlling the works.

Our investigation found that the council and their agents had sent the relevant letters to Mr C's flat to let him know about the works, as they had no alternative address for him. They had also responded to Mr C’s requests for information. Although he was not satisfied, the evidence we saw demonstrated that the surveyors administering the contract on behalf of the council had properly controlled and evaluated work through regular site visits, and had sought to keep all owners updated. In the light of these findings, we did not uphold the complaint as the council's actions, and those of the surveyors acting on their behalf, were reasonable. As, however, we have commented on the limitations of the council’s database of owners in other complaints, we made a recommendation about this.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: update the Ombudsman on the outcome of their attempts to access the landlord registration database, for the purpose of identifying the important group of non-resident owners of properties.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201301254 as a PDF (12.72 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving The City of Edinburgh Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202505687 01 Jun 2026 C complained to the council about damp and mould in their rental property. C had been moved to the property … Upheld
202404014 01 Feb 2026 C complained that the council did not properly consider their concerns about work being carried out on a neighbour’s summerhouse … Not Upheld
202302915 01 Apr 2025 A & B complained to the council about their handling of their claims procedure in relation to the Trams to … Upheld
202303840 01 Oct 2024 C is the grandparent of A and B, whose parents were separated. C complained about the actions of the council … Partly Upheld
202301380 01 Aug 2024 C complained about the council’s social work service during the pre-adoptive process of their child (A). C complained about the … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation