Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Aberdeen City Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201300650 Sector Local Government Category improvements and renovation Decided 01 November 2013

View Aberdeen City Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained to us on behalf of his elderly parents, who he said found it expensive to heat their home because of old draughty windows. Two windows had been replaced but the council had decided not to replace the remaining windows, although they had resealed some. Mr C said this had not made any appreciable difference. He said that a clerk of works from the council had said that the windows would last another eight years and if they were replaced, everyone else would want this. Mr C believed that the council had replaced windows in newer houses than that of his parents, and felt that the criterion for replacement should be based on the condition of the windows, not their age.

When we investigated this, the council told us that their programme of replacement was based on need. They told us also that there had been a robust assessment into the condition of the windows in Mr C’s parents’ house. However, there was no record of the assessment, as reports were usually provided verbally and dealt with at the time. We considered that it was unreasonable not to hold records of assessments or their outcome. We upheld Mr C's complaint about this, and made recommendations. We did not uphold his complaint about newer houses having windows replaced as the council clarified that it is not age but condition which dictates this decision, but we made a related recommendation.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: undertake a further inspection within 10 working days of the issue of our decision and ensure a report is produced; review their current procedures where a request for repair or replacement works is requested, and put in place improvements to record keeping, especially where assessment has found that limited or no works are required; and review their decision not to replace the windows in Mr C's parents' house, based on a fresh reassessment of the windows, and notify Mr C of the outcome of the reassessment and whether this has changed the decision about replacement.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201300650 as a PDF (13.29 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Aberdeen City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202401558 01 Mar 2025 C complained about the council’s handling of communal repairs at a tenement in which C owned a property. Extensive work … Upheld
202208569 01 Dec 2024 C and their autistic child took up their tenancy, having been offered the property following assessment for priority for allocation. … Partly Upheld
202209886 01 Nov 2024 C complained that the council and school staff failed to reasonably respond or act when C told them about domestic … Upheld
202302784 01 Oct 2024 C complained about communication from the council's social work department relating to C’s involvement in the Looked After Child (LAC) … Not Upheld
202106027 01 Jun 2024 C complained about the council’s handling of a planning application. C’s next door neighbour made a retrospective application for planning … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation