Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Glasgow City Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201300141 Sector Local Government Category refuse collection & bins Decided 01 January 2015

View Glasgow City Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C had complained to the council some time ago about the refuse collection service in his street. The council apologised and took action to improve Mr C's experience of the service. They told him that the local supervisor would monitor collections, gave him direct contact details to report any further difficulties and assured him that they would fully investigate any further service failings. After giving the council time to allow these measures to be implemented, Mr C felt that the service had not improved and complained again.

The council said that they treated this as a new complaint because more than a year had passed since he first complained. They did not, however, acknowledge or respond to it, and Mr C complained again. As well as complaining about refuse collection he also raised concerns about the council's complaints handling, but they did not pick up on this and Mr C asked us to look at his complaint.

Our investigation found that the council's complaints handling procedure (CHP), which is based on the model CHP from our Complaints Standards Authority, says that staff should use discretion when applying timescales. We found that Mr C contacted the council on an almost monthly basis when the service did not improve, which meant that his second complaint was not a new one. It was about an ongoing issue and should have been dealt with at stage two of their CHP. The CHP also says that the council will establish what a complaint is about at the start, but we saw no evidence that they did so in Mr C's case. Neither did we see evidence that the stage two response had senior executive sign-off which, again, is contrary to the CHP. We found that the council did not handle Mr C's complaint reasonably, and made two recommendations.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: apologise to Mr C for the failings our investigation identified; and remind staff of the requirements of the model CHP, focusing in particular on the failings our investigation identified.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201300141 as a PDF (12.95 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Glasgow City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202308932 01 Apr 2025 C complained about their experience at the primary school of their child (A) who has additional support needs. C requested … Upheld
202008542 01 Jan 2023 C, a taxi driver, complained about the way the council had handled their medical examination which they were required to … Upheld
202105309 01 Mar 2022 C complained about the council's handling of their complaints about their child (A) being bullied at their school by another … Partly Upheld
201905590 01 Dec 2020 C complained about the council’s handling of their correspondence in relation to an alleged bus lane contravention. C said that … Upheld
201901663 01 Sep 2020 C applied for a community care grant from the Scottish Welfare Fund (SWF) at the council. C's application was refused … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation