Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

The Highland Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201205182 Sector Local Government Category handling of application (complaints by opponents) Decided 01 December 2013

View The Highland Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

The owners of the yard next to Mr C's house submitted a planning application for the replacement and relocation of their boiler house and drying kilns. Mr C complained that, although the application was approved with conditions attached to the permission, the council failed to enforce those conditions. He said that as a consequence he had suffered horrendous noise levels. Mr C alleged that the council failed to assess the impact of the planning consent on his home, failed to follow the correct procedures and pursue enforcement action, and failed to assess his subsequent complaint properly.

The complaint was investigated and we obtained independent advice from one of our planning advisers. We made further enquiries of the council, and gave all the relevant information (including planning documentation and all the complaints correspondence) careful consideration. The planning adviser said that the council acted reasonably and early by ensuring that a noise impact assessment report was obtained for the proposed development and was reflected in the conditions attached to the planning permission. When some of the conditions were not met, the council considered taking enforcement action but decided that it would be more appropriate to have their environmental health department lead on the matter of noise nuisance. The planning adviser confirmed that this was a reasonable decision, as enforcement action is discretionary and the environmental health department could use statutory measures to address matters that might otherwise be outside the scope of the planning authority. He noted that the council had retained the option of taking enforcement action should they wish to pursue it in the future.

Mr C undoubtedly suffered noise nuisance and we found that the council acted on his complaints about this, although not in the way he would have wished. We did not uphold his complaint, as it could not be said that they did not understand his complaint or failed properly to assess it.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201205182 as a PDF (11.53 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving The Highland Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202206966 01 Apr 2024 C was living in a residential unit for young people who are looked after by the council. C complained that … Partly Upheld
202107467 01 Dec 2023 C complained about the council’s handling of allegations that their child made against them, including decisions taken to remove their … Partly Upheld
202002615 01 Apr 2023 C complained about the council’s decision-making in relation to the allocation of Scottish Government Town Centre funding. In terms of … Upheld
201909583 01 May 2021 C complained about the council's social work department's handling of child protection concerns that were raised about their children and … Upheld
201810255 01 Jan 2021 C complained about the council's involvement in respect of the Welfare Guardianship Order (order which allows someone to make ongoing … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation