Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Scottish Prison Service

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201205159 Sector Prisons Category home detention curfew Decided 01 June 2013

View Scottish Prison Service scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C, who is a prisoner, complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) inappropriately took account of false information when considering his application for release under the home detention curfew (HDC) scheme. The SPS said they refused Mr C's application because he had outstanding charges against him but Mr C said that was not true.

In investigating Mr C's complaint, we obtained evidence from the SPS that confirmed that there were outstanding charges against Mr C, which were being investigated by the procurator fiscal. Because of these charges, the SPS felt that Mr C was too high risk to release under the HDC scheme. We were satisfied that the SPS appropriately considered relevant information when considering Mr C's application and because of that, we did not uphold his complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201205159 as a PDF (11.03 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Scottish Prison Service

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202412046 01 Feb 2026 C complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) failed to follow the appropriate procedure after they removed C from association … Upheld
202401074 01 Nov 2025 C complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that they had prompt access … Upheld
202303295 01 Mar 2025 C complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) failed to appropriately investigate their lost property claim. C submitted a claim … Upheld
202006807 01 Sep 2022 C complained about the handing of their Internal Case Management (ICM) case conference. C was unhappy that the Scottish Prison … Partly Upheld
202001300 01 Sep 2022 Ms C provided her express consent for her pronouns to be used for this publication. Ms C complained about matters … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation