Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Scottish Prison Service

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201204249 Sector Prisons Category non-legal correspondence Decided 01 July 2013

View Scottish Prison Service scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C, who is a prisoner, complained that the prison had decided to put his outgoing mail on the mail intercept scheme. This meant that any non legal or non privileged mail that he sent out of the prison could be opened and read by prison staff. Mr C complained that the decision was unreasonable because there was no evidence to support the prison's position.

Our investigation found that the prison took this decison after a copy of a letter he sent to the council was returned to the prison. When prison staff read the letter, which they were entitled to do, they felt its content was threatening. Because of that, the prison took the decision to place Mr C's outgoing non legal or non privileged mail on the mail intercept scheme. We were satisfied the prison had taken a decision they were entitled to take and because of that, we did not uphold Mr C's complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201204249 as a PDF (11.05 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Scottish Prison Service

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202412046 01 Feb 2026 C complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) failed to follow the appropriate procedure after they removed C from association … Upheld
202401074 01 Nov 2025 C complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that they had prompt access … Upheld
202303295 01 Mar 2025 C complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) failed to appropriately investigate their lost property claim. C submitted a claim … Upheld
202006807 01 Sep 2022 C complained about the handing of their Internal Case Management (ICM) case conference. C was unhappy that the Scottish Prison … Partly Upheld
202001300 01 Sep 2022 Ms C provided her express consent for her pronouns to be used for this publication. Ms C complained about matters … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation