Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Lanarkshire NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201203942 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 September 2013

View NHS Lanarkshire scorecard

Full decision

Summary

When Mr C suffered severe chest pains he called an ambulance. The paramedics told him that he was not having a heart attack, but he was taken to hospital for tests. Mr C complained that, despite the paramedics having ruled out a heart attack, he was treated for one upon admission to the hospital. He raised further concerns about a lack of investigation into his chest pain once it was established that he was not having a heart attack, and a lack of follow-up appointments.

We took independent advice on this complaint from one of our medical advisers. The adviser said that paramedics would have carried out an electrocardiogram (ECG - a test to measure the heart's electrical activity and to check for a shortage of blood to the heart muscle). The ECG determines whether the patient is having an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI heart attack), which suggests a complete blockage of one of the coronary arteries. If such a heart attack is evident, paramedics will take the patient to a dedicated cardiac unit, which may not be the closest hospital. In cases of non-STEMI heart attacks (where the artery is only narrowed or partially blocked), the patient will be taken to the nearest hospital and treated with medication while further tests are undertaken. We found that in Mr C's case, the paramedics ruled out a STEMI heart attack and took him to the nearest hospital. He was still considered to potentially have a non-STEMI heart attack and was treated appropriately for this. Ultimately, tests indicated that he had a chest infection and he was treated accordingly. We were satisfied that the board acted appropriately and in accordance with national guidance for coronary artery disease.

We were also generally satisfied that appropriate follow-up appointments were made after Mr C's discharge from hospital. Although one referral to a rheumatologist was not acted upon, we did not find that this had any significant impact on the overall care provided to Mr C.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201203942 as a PDF (11.56 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Lanarkshire NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202410955 01 May 2026 C complained about the standard of medical care provided by the board during two attendances at A&E with severe abdominal … Upheld
202409961 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their adult sibling (A). A had treatment for breast cancer, was … Not Upheld
202502889 01 Feb 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided following their referral for a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP, an … Upheld
202401439 01 Jan 2026 C complained about the care and treatment given to their late sibling (A) who had a history of schizoaffective disorder. … Upheld
202309413 01 Jan 2026 C complained about the standard of medical care and treatment provided to their late partner (A) by the board in … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation