Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Aberdeenshire Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201203866 Sector Local Government Category handling of application (complaints by opponents) Decided 01 December 2013

View Aberdeenshire Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained that the council had not appropriately handled a planning application for an extension to an existing quarry. In particular, he complained that the public and neighbours to the site had not been suitably consulted and notified of the application, that the consent was at odds with an existing planning consent for the site, that the applicant had not provided all the information required and that he was not able to make representations in person to the planning committee.

Our investigation found that the quarry has existing planning consent for mineral extraction and subsequent land fill. The application to which these complaints related was for an extension to the mineral extraction to one side of the area that already had consent for such extraction. We also took independent advice from one of our planning advisers, who said that the application had been appropriately notified through the local press, and that neither an environmental impact assessment nor pre-application consultation was necessary. The adviser also noted that there were shortfalls in the site plan provided, but that this was probably because the council already had plans from a previous application. He said that the council had were not required to make all documents on an application publicly available, and the application had been dealt with appropriately in relation to the plans and information that were considered. We did not, therefore, uphold this complaint, but we made a recommendation to the council to ensure they have all the plans required for future planning applications.

The planning application was determined under delegated powers, and this meant that the council's planning committee were not required to consider the application. The process was conducted according to council policy, and we did not uphold Mr C's complaint that he should have been able to make representation to the committee.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: ensure that plans submitted with a planning application are sufficient to satisfy the terms of Part 3 Regulation 9 section 3 (a) and 3 (b) of the Town and Country Planning (Development and Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2008.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201203866 as a PDF (12.57 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Aberdeenshire Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202302482 01 Dec 2024 C complained that the council had failed to keep their child (A) safe whilst in the council’s care and that … Partly Upheld
202110015 01 May 2024 C complained that the council had unreasonably failed to follow their own enforcement process and relevant planning guidance in response … Not Upheld
202102930 01 Aug 2023 C complained about the council's drainage assessment for a planning application. They said it only considered the likely impact of … Not Upheld
202109163 01 Jul 2023 C’s child (A), was a pupil at a school in the council’s area. C said that A experienced bullying and … Partly Upheld
202108990 01 Jul 2023 C complained that the council failed to provide support to them and their child (A), who had a severe and … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation