Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Glasgow City Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201203365 Sector Local Government Category parks, outdoor centres and facilities Decided 01 March 2014

View Glasgow City Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C corresponded with and complained to the council about their maintenance of a park. He was dissatisfied at the end of the complaints procedure and raised his complaints with us, including that they had not responded appropriately to his complaints.

We found that there was evidence that the council had reasonably maintained the park during the period concerned. However, we also found that the council had not responded reasonably to Mr C's complaints because they did not provide full responses to the issues he raised, and on one occasion provided inaccurate information.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council: apologise to Mr C for the complaints handling issues identified; and ensure all staff are reminded of the need to provide full responses to complaints.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201203365 as a PDF (12.3 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Glasgow City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202308932 01 Apr 2025 C complained about their experience at the primary school of their child (A) who has additional support needs. C requested … Upheld
202008542 01 Jan 2023 C, a taxi driver, complained about the way the council had handled their medical examination which they were required to … Upheld
202105309 01 Mar 2022 C complained about the council's handling of their complaints about their child (A) being bullied at their school by another … Partly Upheld
201905590 01 Dec 2020 C complained about the council’s handling of their correspondence in relation to an alleged bus lane contravention. C said that … Upheld
201901663 01 Sep 2020 C applied for a community care grant from the Scottish Welfare Fund (SWF) at the council. C's application was refused … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation