Summary
Mrs C had concerns that in 2011 the board had sent us a complaints file which was incomplete and contained inaccurate information about previous complaints that she had raised. We had asked for this file when looking at a previous complaint from Mrs C. (We had decided that complaint was too old for us to look at, so the information from the complaint file did not, therefore, affect that decision.) Mrs C formally complained to the board about the file and, when she received their response, she felt her concerns had not been addressed.
Our investigation found that the board had taken Mrs C's concerns seriously and had conducted a thorough investigation. They provided a comprehensive response about the contacts that Mrs C had made with their complaints team as far back as 2007. They also explained the difference between enquiries, informal complaints and formal complaints, and how they deal with these. We, therefore, did not uphold Mrs C's complaint. However, we found that Mrs C had raised a couple of concerns that would have benefitted from a more detailed response and made a recommendation about this.
Recommendations
We recommended that the board: address specific issues raised by Mrs C in her formal complaint.
Related reading
View Decision Report 201203254 as a PDF (12.18 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018