Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201201313 Sector Health Category appointments/admissions (delay, cancellation, waiting lists) Decided 01 May 2013

View NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Miss C complained that when she had a nerve block (an anaesthetic injected directly into the nerves before surgery to numb the area) some of the anaesthetic went into her artery and caused her heart to stop. She had to be resuscitated and was transferred to the intensive treatment unit (ITU) for observation for 24 hours. Miss C also complained that she was prematurely discharged from the ITU.

Our investigation, which included taking independent advice from two of our medical advisers, found that the care and treatment provided to Miss C had been reasonable. Our anaesthetist adviser (anaesthetic specialist) reviewed the clinical records and was satisfied that there had been no error with the administration of the injection. Nerve blocks should be administered under guidance from ultrasound scanning (a special scanning technique using sound waves to produce internal images of the body). It should also be administered at a specific speed. The anaesthetist adviser was satisfied that both of these were carried out correctly and that Miss C had suffered a known, but rare, complication of this type of anaesthesia. The adviser also said that Miss C's collapse was picked up right away and correct action was immediately taken to revive her. The adviser also considered it reasonable that Miss C was sent to the ITU to be observed for 24 hours following her collapse.

On the matter of Miss C's discharge from hospital the following day, both medical advisers considered that she had been appropriately assessed on admission to ITU and prior to discharge. Although Miss C's next of kin had initially been told that she would likely be transferred to a general ward before discharge home, the advisers both considered that it was reasonable that she was discharged directly home. Miss C had been assessed on the morning after the incident as being alert, mobile about the ward, eating and drinking and had passed urine following the removal of her catheter. On the decision to send her home in a taxi, the nursing adviser said that a routine ambulance can take up to 24 hours to arrange so it was reasonable to avoid this delay by sending Miss C home in a taxi.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201201313 as a PDF (11.74 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202205600 01 Aug 2023 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their late parent (A) by the board's out of hours (OOH) … Not Upheld
201803746 01 Nov 2019 Mrs C complained that the board's decision to not provide her child (Child A) with an emergency appointment was unreasonable. … Not Upheld
201802124 01 Oct 2019 Mr and Mrs C complained on behalf of their child (Child A) about the care and treatment they received from … Not Upheld
201708611 01 May 2019 Ms C raised concern about a number of issues in relation to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (the … Partly Upheld
201803350 01 Mar 2019 Ms C complained about the care and treatment she received at the GP out-of-hours service at Gartnavel General Hospital when … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation