Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Scottish Prison Service

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201201004 Sector Prisons Category progression Decided 01 October 2012

View Scottish Prison Service scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C, who is a prisoner, complained to the prison about the delay in carrying out his generic assessment. This is an assessment individual prisoners may receive to determine whether or not they need to participate in any offending behaviour programmes. In responding to Mr C's complaint, the prison told him they were aiming to assess him by April 2013. Mr C said that was an unreasonable timescale.

In investigating Mr C's complaint, the prison explained to us that they prioritise prisoners for assessment in line with their critical dates - these dates include when the prisoner might become eligible for progression to less secure conditions, or their parole qualifying date. Having reviewed the evidence available in Mr C's case, we were satisfied the prison were managing his case appropriately and in line with the normal process. Because of that, we did not uphold the complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201201004 as a PDF (11.11 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Scottish Prison Service

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202412046 01 Feb 2026 C complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) failed to follow the appropriate procedure after they removed C from association … Upheld
202401074 01 Nov 2025 C complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that they had prompt access … Upheld
202303295 01 Mar 2025 C complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) failed to appropriately investigate their lost property claim. C submitted a claim … Upheld
202006807 01 Sep 2022 C complained about the handing of their Internal Case Management (ICM) case conference. C was unhappy that the Scottish Prison … Partly Upheld
202001300 01 Sep 2022 Ms C provided her express consent for her pronouns to be used for this publication. Ms C complained about matters … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation