Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Dental Practice in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201200930 Sector Health Category clinical treatment; diagnosis Decided 01 February 2013

Full decision

Summary

Miss C attended the dental practice complaining of pain in her lower left five tooth. She said that she specifically pointed this out to her dentist. The dentist recorded in the notes that the lower left seven tooth was mobile with a discharge of pus coming from the buccal aspect (cheek side of the tooth). The dentist then extracted the lower left seven tooth.

After around 20 minutes, Miss C returned to the practice and complained that the wrong tooth had been extracted. The dentist recorded that the lower left five tooth was mobile and then removed it. The dentist also recorded that she had apologised to Miss C and explained that the lower left seven tooth was not treatable by any means other than extraction.

In her complaint to us, Miss C understood that the dentist said she would not charge her for this extraction. Our investigation found that the notes completed at the time said that the lower left seven tooth was to be extracted, so we could not say for sure whether the wrong tooth was extracted. However, Miss C clearly thought that it was the lower left five tooth that was to be extracted. We found that the dentist did not obtain consent appropriately and did not communicate with Miss C effectively.

In responding to Miss C's complaint, the dental practice said that the dentist was aware of the crucial importance of securing valid consent prior to any treatment and would not have proceeded with the removal of the lower left seven tooth unless she believed that Miss C understood and agreed to this treatment. We concluded, however, that this was not the case and upheld Miss C's complaint that the practice had provided incorrect explanations as to why the tooth had been removed.

Recommendations

We recommended that the practice: issue a written apology for the failure to obtain consent appropriately for the extraction of the tooth and for failing to communicate effectively with Miss C; and make the dentist aware of our finding on this matter.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201200930 as a PDF (12.84 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Dental Practice in the Greater Glasgo…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202408340 01 May 2025 C complained about being de-registered from their dental practice. C also complained that the practice failed to handle their complaint … Upheld
201608073 01 Aug 2017 Mrs C complained to us on behalf of her husband (Mr A) about dental treatment he had received from the … Not Upheld
201407051 01 May 2016 Mr C saw a dentist at the practice. Arrangements were made for future treatment and Mr C attended a further … Not Upheld
201505349 01 May 2016 Mr C complained about his dentist's charging policy. However, the complaint was resolved when the dental practice offered to change … Resolved / Early Resolution
201407829 01 Dec 2015 Ms C was charged by her dental practice for a missed appointment. Ms C felt this was unreasonable in the … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation