Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Aberdeen City Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201200710 Sector Local Government Category finance - rent Decided 01 January 2013

View Aberdeen City Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C, who is a council employee, is also a council tenant living in a property that was 'tied' to his employment. He complained that the process followed by the council, prior to increasing the rent on what were formerly tied properties, did not comply with their responsibilities in terms of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2001 (the Act). In addition, he complained that the council failed to obtain written agreement, between landlord and tenant, before varying the terms of the tenancy, again, in breach of the Act.

When we examined the complaints it because clear that both parties had different interpretations of the Act and that to reach a clear view, a decision would need to be made on which interpretation was correct. As this can only be determined by the courts, we were unable to uphold the complaints.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201200710 as a PDF (11.06 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Aberdeen City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202401558 01 Mar 2025 C complained about the council’s handling of communal repairs at a tenement in which C owned a property. Extensive work … Upheld
202208569 01 Dec 2024 C and their autistic child took up their tenancy, having been offered the property following assessment for priority for allocation. … Partly Upheld
202209886 01 Nov 2024 C complained that the council and school staff failed to reasonably respond or act when C told them about domestic … Upheld
202302784 01 Oct 2024 C complained about communication from the council's social work department relating to C’s involvement in the Looked After Child (LAC) … Not Upheld
202106027 01 Jun 2024 C complained about the council’s handling of a planning application. C’s next door neighbour made a retrospective application for planning … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation